Journal of Technology and Teacher Education

Volume 4, Number 2 1996

Contents

Developing Preservice Teacher's Computer Competencies

Rich Valde, Randall Bower, and Rex A. Thomas 83

Preservice Teacher Education Students and Computers:

How Does Intervention Affect Attitudes?

Martha A. Gabriel and Colla J. MacDonald 91

Effect of Intergenerational Co-Learning of Software on Preservice and

Inservice Teachers' Computer Anxiety

Mary L. Stephen 17

The Teaching Decisions Simulation: An Interactive Vehicle for

Mapping Teaching Decisions

Harold R. Strang 133

Preparing Special Education Teachers at a Distance:

Effective Televised Instruction

Joan P. Sebastian, M. Winston Egan, Marshall Welch,

and Brent Page 145

The Different Ways Preservice Teachers Have Used an Electronic Discussion

List in a Science Methods Course

M.O. Thirunarayanan 161


Abstracts


Developing Preservice Teacher's Computer Competencies Developing Preservice Teacher's Computer Competencies

RICH VALDE

Computation Center

Iowa State University

Ames, IA 50010, USA

RANDALL BOWER

Computer Science Department

REX A. THOMAS

Computation Center

Preservice teachers need a vision, very early in their college career, for using computers in their classrooms. The vision is needed to motivate and direct their learning of technology and related instructional methods. This paper describes the use of a simulation which is a simplified model of computer operations with "programming" tasks for the user to complete. The simulation is used to help meet three learning goals for preservice teachers. First, it serves as a basis for understanding computer operations and programming. Second, it acts as a first step in assisting preservice teachers to learn computer concepts. Finally, it aids in developing a vision of the value and use of computers in learning.

Return to Contents

Preservice Teacher Education Students and Computers: How Does Intervention Affect Attitudes? Preservice Teacher Education Students and Computers: How Does Intervention Affect Attitudes?

MARTHA A. GABRIEL AND COLLA J. MacDONALD

University of Ottawa

Faculty of Education

145 Jean-Jacques Lussier

Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada

This study explores the effect of a computers-in-education course on the attitudes of preservice teacher education students toward computers. The Computer Attitude Scale (Loyd & Gressard, 1986) was administered to a group of 94 teacher education students enrolled in a required computer course. In addition to gathering pre- and post-questionnaire data, the researchers observed these students in the computer laboratory, and conducted interviews with nine of them. Findings regarding these students' attitudes and practices underline the importance of accommodating individual learning styles and needs in the process of training. The findings also suggest the importance of the role played by the teacher-training institution in fostering and supporting positive attitudes toward computers and their implementation in the classroom.

Return to Contents

Effect of Intergenerational Co-Learning of Software on Preservice and Inservice Teachers' Computer Anxiety Effect of Intergenerational Co-Learning of Software on Preservice and Inservice Teachers' Computer Anxiety

MARY L. STEPHEN

Harris-Stowe State College

3026 Laclede Avenue

St. Louis, MO 63103,USA

Teacher educators preparing students to use technology effectively in educational settings often face the challenge of working with computer-anxious students with minimal computer experience. This paper describes a study involving preservice teachers and first grade students as co-learners of a hypermedia authoring system. The study examined potential benefits for preservice teachers from such co-learning, and the impact of co-learning with young children on the preservice teacher's level of computer anxiety. Not all students in the college class benefited equally. Factors identified in this study which impacted the preservice teacher's level of computer anxiety were the college student's perception of the purpose of the project, the role assumed with respect to the first grade students, and the adult's individual learning style. The major benefit of this co-learning activity for the preservice teachers was first-hand knowledge of the differences between how adults and children approach computers with the corresponding implications for designing computer activities involving children.

Return to Contents

The Teaching Decisions Simulation: An Interactive Vehicle for Mapping Teaching Decisions The Teaching Decisions Simulation: An Interactive Vehicle for Mapping Teaching Decisions

HAROLD R. STRANG

Curry School of Education

University of Virginia, 405 Emmet Street

Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA

This Visual Basic simulation enables participants to engage in fundamental lesson-planning activities such as deciding where pupils will be located in the classroom, with whom they will interact, what activities they will engage in, and what the teacher will do during the lesson. Post-lesson feedback is provided via an event record which presents both a sequential text listing of each participant's decisions and a graphical matrix which presents a comprehensive picture of the participant's planning activities. Initial research results suggest that experienced teachers exhibit more deliberation in completing the simulation than do preservice teachers. This deliberation translates into taking more time to reach better decisions-decisions that reflect personal control and pupil empathy. Plans for improving the simulation center on streamlining its information accessing features.

Return to Contents

Preparing Special Education Teachers at a Distance: Effective Televised Instruction Preparing Special Education Teachers at a Distance: Effective Televised Instruction

JOAN P. SEBASTIAN

Department of Special Education

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

M. WINSTON EGAN

Department of Educational Psychology

Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

MARSHALL WELCH

Department of Special Education

University of Utah

BRENT PAGE

Department of Psychology

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA

This qualitative study describes the perceptions of adult distance learners who were involved in a graduate special education distance teacher education program delivered via televised instruction. Using a focus group method, study participants were interviewed to identify the elements of effective televised instruction delivered using both closed circuit television and pre-recorded video. Four themes emerged during the data analysis that provide insight into the question "What makes a difference in televised instruction?" Study results include a description of each of the four themes identified as critical for effective televised instruction. Examples of participants responses are included to illustrate the data patterns. Implications for the design of televised instruction conclude this article.

Return to Contents

The Different Ways Preservice Teachers Have Used an Electronic Discussion List in a Science Methods Course The Different Ways Preservice Teachers Have Used an Electronic Discussion List in a Science Methods Course

M.O. THIRUNARAYANAN,

Elementary Education Department

Rowan College of New Jersey

Glassboro, NJ 08028-1701, USA

An electronic discussion list was established in the autumn of 1993 for use by preservice science teachers who enrolled each semester in a science methods course taught by the author. Over a two year period, many students have subscribed to the list each semester and have posted several hundred messages. In this paper the author reviews the messages posted on the list during the semester of spring 1995, and describes the different ways students have used the discussion list. During the first two years of its existence, the list has been used for many purposes. These include: (a) providing interesting information, (b) sharing science activities, (c) following up on classroom activities, (d) sharing information about resources, (e) submitting a course assignment, (f) asking questions and getting answers, (g) answering instructor's questions, (h) sharing internship experiences, (i) seeking and receiving ideas, (j) providing feedback regarding course assignments, and (k) providing feedback about the discussion list itself. Messages posted on the discussion list are excerpted and reproduced throughout this paper.

Return to Contents